Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 02:50

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Boeing airplane orders rise to highest level since late 2023 ahead of Paris Air Show - CNBC
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What are the latest developments in the tech industry?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
How do people develop stage 4 cancer without noticing until it’s too late?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Exclusive: Clean energy investment hits new highs and shows no sign of slowing - TechCrunch
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Your VPN could be giving your browsing data to China, watchdog says - NBC News
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Thank you.
Can a cop pull you over walking home asking why you are out so late?